PDA

View Full Version : 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse review




Administrator
05-22-2009, 10:09 AM
http://www.autoguide.com/gallery/d/50559-4/2009-mitsubishi-eclipse-05.jpg

When is a sports car not a sports car? When it shares a platform with an SUV. That was an expensive lesson for General Motors to learn with its disastrous Chevrolet SSR, so why should Mitsubishi hold out hope that having its Eclipse coupe sharing a platform with the Endeavor soft-roader is a good idea?

The current fourth-generation Eclipse is far removed from the original '90s performance icon. If you were involved with the street racing or off-road rally scene in the '90s, the Mitsubishi Eclipse was the hottest car on the street – or off. Representing one third of the Diamond Star Motors (DSM) triplets, the others being the Eagle Talon and Plymouth Laser, the Eclipse made its reputation on a ruggedly built, but ultimately fragile, turbocharged four-cylinder engine connected to a sophisticated all-wheel drive system. It was as close to a Lancer Evolution that North America would see for another decade.

The ultimate expression of the Eclipse's position in the import-tuning scene played out in the first movie in the Fast & Furious franchise, with the bright-green second-generation version as the show's star. Not long afterwards, when the Eclipse was due for a redesign, the company did away with the AWD system, and installed a heavy V6 in place of the turbo-four. Talk about a letdown. The third and subsequently fourth-generation Eclipses have promised so much in terms of performance and style, but haven't really resonated with the crowd that used to adore them.

It's a good thing that the Eclipse looks reasonably good, with big fenders, deep sills and that integrated rear spoiler. For 2009, it undergoes a little cosmetic surgery to better reflect the new corporate nose at Mitsubishi, with a blacked-out grille and front bumper. HID headlights are a new option. The rear now features a dual exhaust and darkened plastic mimicking an underbody diffuser.

More: 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse (http://www.autoguide.com/manufacturer/mitsubishi/2009-mitsubishi-eclipse-1112.html) on AutoGuide.com




97GreenSpyder
05-22-2009, 11:43 AM
The PIG exposed! No wonder it weighs so friggin' much compared to the 2G, what imbecile moved it off the Galant platform and onto that of a SUV? Suuuuuu-eeeeeeee!

Most car companies build mini-SUV's from what started as a car platform. These lamebrains tried the opposite. The Mitsu-Turd exposed (and verily, it stinketh)!

thewraith
05-22-2009, 06:28 PM
It's a shame because it really is a good looking car again. The 3g's were the ugliest design I've ever seen, I preferred the cougar to them.

Tombaman
05-22-2009, 07:06 PM
I never like the 3g at all. And the 4g is nice looks wise, but performance wise they just seemed lacking.

4g64fiero
05-23-2009, 11:19 PM
That article says its heavy @3200 lbs. It blames the SUV platform its based off of. This is rediculous. 3200 lbs is not heavy today at all, its actually quite light, lighter than the genesis actually.

The guy who wrote that article is right, but for all the wrong reasons.

lazylaser
05-23-2009, 11:44 PM
the SUV platform its based off of.

SUV platform....= AWD CONVERSION?

:D

97GreenSpyder
05-24-2009, 07:09 AM
Check the 2009 Mitsu Eclipse Specs from the manufacturer's webpage- GT Hatch w/ V6 & manual = 3479#. How much "road-hugging weight" you think an AWD system would add? BTW, Spyder GT w/ 5pd auto = 3754#. Now THAT's a porker.

Hellvector
05-29-2009, 08:00 AM
Considering the new Camaro SS is supposed to be at a curb weight of 3860. That Spyder is heavy as hell.

dyablo
08-25-2009, 05:40 PM
wow its seems to gain wight every year.

PorkChop
08-26-2009, 12:32 PM
The srt8 hemi charger weighs about the same is this thing. Of course the hp between the two is significant so weigh it out to come to yer own conclusion. Change to this model not particularly appealing:(