I found this vid of a stage II turbo 420A. Best I've seen so figured I'd share it. ENJOY!! And I Hope this is an insipartion for all you 420A DSMers!
After all, the 4G63 isn't the only motor that can sound sick modified........
Anyway, the one video I could see, the rest were only green , was sick. I only have one question. What the hell is stage two turbo. That tells me nothing and is not much more than ricer talk IMO. The only time I've heard of stage 1,2,3 etc and it made much sense was talking to some SRT-4 owners with Mopar upgrades.
Anyway, the one video I could see, the rest were only green , was sick.
they all worked for me???
Quote:
Originally Posted by GIZMO
What the hell is stage two turbo. That tells me nothing and is not much more than ricer talk IMO. The only time I've heard of stage 1,2,3 etc and it made much sense was talking to some SRT-4 owners with Mopar upgrades.
It's common among 420a's because of the way kits were sold from hahn and star. You can thank their marketing for that. Usually the difference between one and two was an intercooler and more boost. But yeah it gives you know info on the turbo. Hahn, S16G; Star, turbonetics hybrid t3/t4 50 or 57 trim not too sure think they also had bb as an option. Either way usually when people refer to stage I-II on a 420a it probably just means their turboed on the stock block.
and the fag with his arm out the window, I was hoping they wouod swing by a low laying tree, rip that fucker right off... RICERS!
Wow, a little jealous? I give my respects to the most powerful inline 4 in the U.S, the 4G63, but not to ass-wipes that want to down play other peoples cars. 1st off- before my Eclipse, I had an 88 FC3S RX7 All motor that ran 12s and ate GSX/GS-Ts ALL THE TIME. Only one kept up with me and it was a beautiful pearl white 2G GSX. 2nd - your rants prolly don't match your driving skills, and 3rd - saying why bother with a 420a or any other motor is like saying: "why restore that 69' rusted Mustang", or "why put a turbo on a Corvette","or why drop a rotary motor in a porsche?"
What diffrence does it make? After all, most turbo factory setups SUCK anyway, and when you upgrade you end up having all these spare turbo parts that nobody wants.
IT'S THE PASSION, NOT WHAT'S THIS OR WHY DO THAT- IT'S AN EXPRESSION AND I THINK IT'S SAFE TO SAY THAT ANYTHING HAS POTENTIAL, OR THE ABILITY TO BE MADE FAST.
AND BY THE WAY THIS IS THE NON-TURBO FORUM, YOU MUST HAVE CHOSE THIS LIKE BY MISTAKE:eek:
im sure it is a 17second car, 18sec. if he does what i think he would do in the 1/4 mile.
he'd have to be pretty retarded to run a 17 considering they run faster than that without boost
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSM420_Turbo
Wow, a little jealous? I give my respects to the most powerful inline 4 in the U.S, the 4G63, but not to ass-wipes that want to down play other peoples cars. 1st off- before my Eclipse, I had an 88 FC3S RX7 All motor that ran 12s and ate GSX/GS-Ts ALL THE TIME. Only one kept up with me and it was a beautiful pearl white 2G GSX. 2nd - your rants prolly don't match your driving skills, and 3rd - saying why bother with a 420a or any other motor is like saying: "why restore that 69' rusted Mustang", or "why put a turbo on a Corvette","or why drop a rotary motor in a porsche?"
What diffrence does it make? After all, most turbo factory setups SUCK anyway, and when you upgrade you end up having all these spare turbo parts that nobody wants.
IT'S THE PASSION, NOT WHAT'S THIS OR WHY DO THAT- IT'S AN EXPRESSION AND I THINK IT'S SAFE TO SAY THAT ANYTHING HAS POTENTIAL, OR THE ABILITY TO BE MADE FAST.
AND BY THE WAY THIS IS THE NON-TURBO FORUM, YOU MUST HAVE CHOSE THIS LIKE BY MISTAKE:eek:
Well said.
People on this forum need to have some respect for each other, everyone's always so quick to bash any 420a instead of giving someone props for putting in the effort and having the desire required to work on a harder starting platform.
Seriously guys stop, everytime someone makes a thread about 420a's the 4g63 guys come in here and bash it. STOP IT. I don't care about your opinions and I can guarantee you most others don't either, this guy just posted a video about a modded 420a whats wrong with that? I don't see anywhere were he made claims to it being all superior to the 4g63. I swear someone buys a gst or gsx and automatically thinks there a car expert. Noone bash after this just post comments that pertain to the thread please and let the 420a guys do there thing and the 4g63 guys do there thing plain and simple.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.
, was sick. I only have one question. What the hell is stage two turbo. That tells me nothing and is not much more than ricer talk IMO. The only time I've heard of stage 1,2,3 etc and it made much sense was talking to some SRT-4 owners with Mopar upgrades.
Wow, a little jealous? I give my respects to the most powerful inline 4 in the U.S, the 4G63, but not to ass-wipes that want to down play other peoples cars. 1st off- before my Eclipse, I had an 88 FC3S RX7 All motor that ran 12s and ate GSX/GS-Ts ALL THE TIME. Only one kept up with me and it was a beautiful pearl white 2G GSX. 2nd - your rants prolly don't match your driving skills, and 3rd - saying why bother with a 420a or any other motor is like saying: "why restore that 69' rusted Mustang", or "why put a turbo on a Corvette","or why drop a rotary motor in a porsche?"
Linear Mode
