I'm redrkt.
There are some things about that dyno that i don't quite fully understand.
1. Are those dyno figures corrected or uncorrected?
2. No boost controller and a 15psi actuator. If the actuator was set loose enough to crack open at 12 psi, it should have been fully open at 15psi, and it seems like the boost would be held there. I don't understand why it creeped from 12 psi to 24psi at the end of the pull, being that the 38mm internal gate is known not to creep like that. What would cause it to creep like that? About the only thing i can think of is a shot of nitrous.
3. Stock timing? It's obvious that Rocky has taken out quite a bit of airflow by looking at the stock boost gauge. It is around 7psi most of the pull and never goes all the way to 14psi. The stock boost gauge is representative of the airflow signal the ecu is seeing, after it's molested by the AFC. With that low of airflow he is getting pretty aggressive timing advance, i'd guess somewhere around 24-26* peak at 6k rpm. Which leads me to my next observation.
It took Dre sometime tuning with a standalone and wideband(and alot of other mods) to make 390-400whp on pump gas. He found that to make it happen he had to run a much
less agressive timing curve than even a stock 2g, which is less aggressive than the stock 1g timing curve. Most other people have found the same to be true with timing to make big power on pump gas. High boost & timing(even stock timing), and pumpgas doesn't work well together, which makes it hard for me to believe Rocky's run was really on pump gas.
Your customers did the testing for you? So the issue still remains that you did not do any testing of your product before releasing it to the public.
This is why it's important for testing to be done by a reputable company or person, so the information can be given accurately and completely. Why would Rocky lie? Who knows, maybe to win $150 dollars. Maybe he didn't lie, and i'm just missing some important information that isn't available.
