DSMTalk Forums: Mitsubishi Eclipse, Plymouth Laser, and Eagle Talon Forum banner

AWD driveline loss, much higher then I thought

6.2K views 46 replies 22 participants last post by  roadpie4u  
#1 ·
I was Gtechting my girlfriends second gen Probe GT and did a dyno run. I ended getting 135hp. IT's really close to the 130hp real dyno runs for stock GTs. And since it was 48 degrees that night it probably eplains the slightly higher hp readings. This is really close number to a real dyno reading and equals out to a 18% loss.

SO I try the same thing with my talon and get 212hp at 16psi on pump gas. Hmmm not to impreasive since my automatic talon weights like 400lbs more then the probe. Then I look up so real dyno runs for 3000gt vr4s and notice that they loose %30 of their power through the AWD system. THey only get 224 Wheel HP and weight more then my car. ON the newest sports compact magazine they did a AWD dyno run on a WRX and got a %30 loss too only getting 158hp to the wheels. Do AWD DSMs have this much power loss too? Mine is also an automatic so If I loose just as much as other AWDs that means that my loss is up to %35!! Looking at my numbers I would have to make 325hp at the crank to get the 212hp gtech reading. I somehow feel very robbed. Imagine 325 hp on a 20% loss. I guess that would explain why many FWD with T28s dyno at 260hp.
 
#4 ·
I think he was saying...

That the 18% was for the FWD probe and that the AWD was loosing like 30%. That was a case of selective reading my friend?? :)
 
#9 ·
I've been trying to look everywhere for dyno results of a AWD DSM. Where do people get the 18% loss for AWD? I can't find any what so ever. Infact most FWD and RWD have around 18% loss from what i've seen. But I did find EVOs, Subarus wrx, sti, and 3000gts. Both the 3000gt and subaru WRXs loose about %30 thorough the drive train and the automatic WRX lost %40!!! The EVO VI lost about %28!! Now what makes Our cars so special to loose a lot less then other AWDs? I'm not saying that everyione here is wrong but I'm a bit skeptical about the %18 - %20 loss numbers. Here is a link to many AWD and some RWD dyno results if anyone wants to check. http://dyno.scoobynet.co.uk/
 
#10 ·
this is my newbieness coming through but how do you lose power through the drive train? where does it go?
 
#11 ·
Suryc said:
this is my newbieness coming through but how do you lose power through the drive train? where does it go?
its through friction. thats why awd loses so much more than fwd because it has to send power to the back of the car so it has more parts to lose power through, thats why fwds have the least loss, because they just have to send power to the front. hope this helped.

-Aaron
 
#12 ·
Thats why if you have an awd you go for parts that build more torque as well has horsepower. What is going to bring you through that driveline loss better, 10 hp, or 10ft lbs of torque. Our cars have a lot of torque for such little engines, I bet just a lightweight harmonic balencer and other torque gains would make our cars faster, while it would just cuase a fwd to lose more tracion. then again torque breaks stuff too hehe. fwd dsms are the high speed killers...
 
#16 ·
V8SpankR said:
Do you use your G*Tech at the strip? I run mine when I race and it shows my car to be 4 tenths quicker consistently than my actual 1/4 mile time.
That is about right, because I think in my instruction booklet that came with it said that it would be + or - 3 tenths of a second + or - 3 horsepower etc. My GTECH does a pretty good job in my opinion.
 
#18 ·
yeah but then when we do take off like that we break shit. I think it basically all evens out with the advantages and disadvantages.
 
#22 ·
damn!

I was hoping that I missed something. I want to learn more about driveline loss!

A few months ago, I heard these two guys talking and one of them was bragging that his dad has a cuda (i think), that had 900+hp at the flywheel, and 700hp at the wheels, but then getting less than 2mi/gal.

big drop in hp to the wheels.
 
#23 ·
I was reading about driveline loss at a Pontiac Grand Prix club and they say they loose about 23% on their FWD automatics. I guess that's not too bad for an automatic but i'm probably loosing like %30 on mine. An extra 5% loss from an automatic starts to hurt when you start to make over 300hp.
 
#24 ·
One possible solution for gaining back those lost ponies is
using lighter part such as TE37's etc..etc carbonfiber drive shaft, lighter brake $y$tem. Reducing the rotating mass. Is it worth it...why not just slap "MUTT" on your car and make more horses..

:-( you will still have drivetrain loss. So Its somthing we "all wheel drivers" will have to live with.
 
#25 ·
30% is a little hard to swallow. That just seems like an absurdly high number that doesn't jive with the times AWD people are running. Realize that the only way to know the drivetrain loss in an AWD DSM drivetrain is to measure the drivetrain loss in an AWD DSM. Looking at the 3/S and WRX dyno's is a good reference, but is still only conjecture here.

G-Tech numbers aren't reliable enough to go by. People that have actually compared them with actual 1/4 numbers (like V8SpankR) always report significant disprepancies, in both ET and MPH. I've never used one, but if it's saying that it will usually be off by +/- 3 tenths, that's ~ 30 horsepower for most people!

The AWD drivetrain loss is damn high, but I don't think it's 30% (Maybe an automatic AWD DSM, though). We should be able to find out for sure soon enough, though - a new AWD dyno is opening up by my house in Garland, TX, and the NTEX Club DSM is almost surely going to get together an AWD Dyno Day or something when it does, most likely in August or September. I'll be the first in line :D :D