Hehe. Yes, the 16G has served me faithfully for close to 3 years. This particular unit (big 16G) is about 9 months old with less than 5000 miles on it...it's for sale if anyone is interested. Email me privately.
Anyway, I am field testing a new turbocharger. It's not a Frank, it's not a Garrett, but it is a hybrid. I really don't want to say much until I get it in and see how well it works. I am expecting to be in the neighborhood of 11.3-.4 in the low 120s with it, all based on subjective data of course.
One person running the "small" version of this new turbo is running 28psi on pump gas. The first thing out of my mouth too was, "You're nuts!", but he's even *adding* timing. There's no knock or anything...the unit is super efficient. The car is slightly slower than a comparably modded DSM with a Frank 5...but don't forget we're talking about a turbo with a substantially lower CFM rating.
The new turbo is hitting 28psi by 4000 (what's lag?!) and the Frank 5 takes a day and a half. That makes a big difference in ET even if it makes less power. The particular car with the Frank 5 was running 119-120mph so I am thinking about 116-117mph out of the new turbo with similar ETs (mid/high 11s). It's also still internally gated and he's run it at 15psi with no creep!
As I said, it is the small version. I am getting one 100CFM larger and the guy with the Frank 5 sold it the day after he drove the car with this new turbo on it and ordered a big one (300CFM larger than the small one). Like I said, we're field testing various setups. The compressor housings are all the same, but we're playing with inducer/exducer sizing and various turbine housings, wheels, and clips.
The first test car (small turbo) had a tranny problem, but I think it's fixed and he is planning on racing it tomorrow for the first time on this setup. He's whole-heartedly expecting 11s. This coming from a best of 12.5 @ 111 on the previous 16G. Friends intimate with the performance of my car and his say that I wouldn't stand a chance against his car now...sounds like 11s material to me. They just will not shut up about it. My turbo was built today and I should hopefully have it by the end of next week. Until then (or he races tomorrow) this is all talk....they've got me all fired up about it

They may be right, or not, but they've been running DSMs for years with all kinds of different turbos and if they say this one is the shit, I have to believe them.
There's talk of a dyno on Sat. as well so all eyes are on him right now. I can't tell you the flow rate yet because you won't believe it. I don't believe it if it's putting that much power out. THEY didn't believe it. After installing it and feeling the power of it, they called the manufacturer to check that they didn't accidentally send a larger unit! Let's just say if he steps up with 380+ to the wheels and 11s, I am gonna freak
All I know is everything I've heard about this is right up my alley: efficient, bolt-on install, it makes power, it spools fast, and it should be relatively cheap. If this thing does what they swear it does, it could mean the utter demise of Franks. Someone, not any of us, has already dubbed it the "Frank Killer"

We don't particularly like that name though. IHI tried that with 16Gs and, well, it just didn't live up to its name. We certainly don't want anyone comparing these to that failure. Thus far, it's just been affectionately referred to as "The Mutt".
I'll definitely keep everyone posted on either how his car runs or how mine does depending who actually gets to the track/dyno first.