DSMTalk Forums: Mitsubishi Eclipse, Plymouth Laser, and Eagle Talon Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
41 - 54 of 54 Posts
Thats right 94mph bitch( I ran 14.6@97mph with a filter and two free mods), faster than a 93mph trap, and look at my 60ft. The Type R has LSD(hence the better 1/4 14.9 to 15.0).

Owned who? It was bad driving on my part moron.


Go take that SRT4 to rainbow *** parade and go sit on your exhaust.


I can give a fuck about stock, im modded, NOT STOCK, as are 99% of all DSM's.


Why the hell are you even on here? go back to the SRT4 forums with that bullshit Honda loving.


this **** is probably a fanboy that would tattoo a Honda sign on his butt cheek. :eek:
 
Save
dsmfan95 said:
Are you that fucking dumb? You fucking posted a link to a 14second Type R in an earlier post trapping almost 94mph. Guess what your car trapped stock. That's right, 94mph.



Yes, Ivan backed his shit up by owning himself. He posted a timeslip of each and the one of the Type R was faster. Evidently your friend is the one who cares which is faster stock for stock because he made it his mission to "blow this myth out of the water". I never claimed 14.6, but Motor Trend did get 14.7 stock. Whereas no other magazine could get a DSM into the 14's except for the 95 GSX.

I'm not stock, I'm deep into the 13's with minimal mods (even stock exhaust and stock tires).
My friend has more knowledge about cars in general than you. I have known him for awhile and he backs his shit up. Thats why he gets my respect. Unfortunately people like you who start the name calling and get pissed off real easily because someone holds true to there statements...explains a perfect tale why you dont have anything to back up your statements. Instead of cursing and bashing..why dont you post a timselip of that bone stock "14.6 Type R" you were talking about. Chances are..it doesn't exist and never will. If you cant handle a legitimate debate, maybe you need to go back to srtforums war stories and talk your e-thuggin shit there.
 
Hes talking magazine times(thats why he can't get a slip)

I provided a site where I see times, the guy has his car posted, ran a 14.9@93mph.

But there was no timeslip, hell Fahad remember yesterday the LS/VTEC hatch that was posted on dragtimes.com claimed he ran a 12.2@105mph with only a 75shot? :eek:

Image



Stock ITR dyno 157whp


Quoted from a magazine

Powered by the frantic B18C5 VTEC four cylinder engine,The problem is compounded by the fact that the torque peaks at a massive 7500 rpm, thereby making the Type-R no better than a basic Civic at low revs. To put it in perspective, even the new 140 hp Saturn Ion makes more torque, at 145 lb-ft.

The Integra Type-R gives the driver quite a beating in city traffic. The stiffer suspension provides for a very harsh ride over uneven roads, and the need to rev hard just to get enough grunt to start moving is tedious. On the highway, the drone of the noisy engine at constant speed is almost unbearable, while compounded by the fact that most sound-deadening materials have been ditched to reduce weight
 
Save
redfury said:
Hes talking magazine times(thats why he can't get a slip)

I provided a site where I see times, the guy has his car posted, ran a 14.9@93mph.

But there was no timeslip, hell Fahad remember yesterday the LS/VTEC hatch that was posted on dragtimes.com claimed he ran a 12.2@105mph with only a 75shot? :eek:

Image



Stock ITR dyno 157whp


Quoted from a magazine

Powered by the frantic B18C5 VTEC four cylinder engine,The problem is compounded by the fact that the torque peaks at a massive 7500 rpm, thereby making the Type-R no better than a basic Civic at low revs. To put it in perspective, even the new 140 hp Saturn Ion makes more torque, at 145 lb-ft.

The Integra Type-R gives the driver quite a beating in city traffic. The stiffer suspension provides for a very harsh ride over uneven roads, and the need to rev hard just to get enough grunt to start moving is tedious. On the highway, the drone of the noisy engine at constant speed is almost unbearable, while compounded by the fact that most sound-deadening materials have been ditched to reduce weight
That was a good clear dyno on what a basically stock Type R will dyno. Yeah i remember that guy yesterday claiming a 12.2 @105 mph..that was hilarious. Atleast he couldve been more accurate about the trap speed to make it a little more believeable without a timeslip. But wait..i didnt know a 75 shot drops nearly 2 seconds off the e/t. Shit thats fast :p
 
redfury said:
Thats right 94mph bitch( I ran 14.6@97mph with a filter and two free mods), faster than a 93mph trap, and look at my 60ft. The Type R has LSD(hence the better 1/4 14.9 to 15.0).

Owned who? It was bad driving on my part moron.


Go take that SRT4 to rainbow *** parade and go sit on your exhaust.


I can give a fuck about stock, im modded, NOT STOCK, as are 99% of all DSM's.
If you don't give a fuck about stock then why in the goddamn fuck did you argue the point? Dumbass. The Type R ran faster than you because you can't drive for shit. You run a 2.4 60', then get 3mph more on the trap and drop your time by only 4 tenths?

You talk out your ass. You owned yourself by posting two timeslips proving yourself wrong so you start making excuses. Then to add insult to injury, you start flaming me for having a faster car than yourself. How old are you? 17?

FourG63 98GST said:
My friend has more knowledge about cars in general than you. I have known him for awhile and he backs his shit up. Thats why he gets my respect. Unfortunately people like you who start the name calling and get pissed off real easily because someone holds true to there statements...explains a perfect tale why you dont have anything to back up your statements. Instead of cursing and bashing..why dont you post a timselip of that bone stock "14.6 Type R" you were talking about. Chances are..it doesn't exist and never will. If you cant handle a legitimate debate, maybe you need to go back to srtforums war stories and talk your e-thuggin shit there.
Who started getting pissed off? You were the first one to start with the profanity when proven wrong. Sounds like you're the one who can't take the truth. He hasn't backed shit up. Nothing he has posted has supported his argument, if anything it's proven himself wrong. Why would I need to post a timeslip when this dumbass does it for me and makes himself look even more stupid in the process.


Legitimate debate?

FourG63 98GST said:
Ivan already backed his shit up..where are you? Who gives a flying fuk about whos faster stock for stock??
Sounds like you are the one who can't handle it since you "don't give a flying fuck" about it. How about instead of trying to argue with me, you take his dick out of your ass and start coming up with better posts.
 
dsmfan95 said:
you take his dick out of your ass
and let the high school jokes begin....very clever. Congratulations! You just won a Noble Insult Prize. Thats the first time i heard that one :rolleyes: .

dsmfan95 said:
start coming up with better posts.
start coming up with better insults.

Dude, go see a psychiatrist and get some anger management pills. It doesnt seem like you did too well in English class since every sentence you write consists of a curse word and retarded 2nd grade remarks. I dont need to say any more about you..your a retard and your car is slow and ugly.

Im done with you
 
dsmfan95 said:
If you don't give a fuck about stock then why in the goddamn fuck did you argue the point? Dumbass. The Type R ran faster than you because you can't drive for shit. You run a 2.4 60', then get 3mph more on the trap and drop your time by only 4 tenths?

You talk out your ass. You owned yourself by posting two timeslips proving yourself wrong so you start making excuses. Then to add insult to injury, you start flaming me for having a faster car than yourself. How old are you? 17?

I spent exactly 25 bucks to run a 14.6 and trap 97mph, turned a 14.1 with a few more mods and drag radials (Run was made in early 2004)

You were the one who bought profanity first, not me, you just got pissed because you have absolutly no evidence to prove a 14.6 timeslip.


I Should be in the 13s, just like you princess.(my 75 shot is helping alot,guys have trapped 104-105 with my setup)


Actually, yeah I couldn't drive for shit that night, with bald 205 All Season BF Goodrichs (first run at a track as well).


Show me your timeslip, better show a 60ft. better than 2.0 if your going to downtalk my driving.


And im actually 23...


Get that neon exhaust pipe out of your ass, and get out some more.
 
Save
You claim you own a SRT4, but your sig says

Justin-Civic Owner


Image




That is your car isn't it princess ?



I wonder why hes defending the Type R's so much....
 
Save
redfury said:
You claim you own a SRT4, but your sig says

Justin-Civic Owner


Image




That is your car isn't it princess ?



I wonder why hes defending the Type R's so much....
:D complete Ownage

Actually i saw that in his profile awhile back..just didnt say anything. But yeah that pretty much explains why hes getting anal hurt over us telling him how much inferrior a torquless Lawnmowing Type R is compared to a DSM. Ivan, i gotta give you props for getting proof and displaying it. proof > Smack talk..and DSM fan you have been pinned for the 3 count. Now STFU and eat shit pansy (sorry..had to say that)..whoo im out
 
41 - 54 of 54 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.